Law and You > Criminal Laws > Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 > Corporate Criminal Liability
Corporate criminal liability refers to the legal principle that a corporation, as a distinct legal entity, can be held criminally responsible for the actions or omissions of its employees, directors, and agents that result in criminal conduct. This concept recognizes that, although a corporation is a non-human entity, it can still be held accountable for illegal activities that benefit or arise from its operations. The doctrine of corporate criminal liability has evolved as businesses have become more complex, and the range of corporate activities has expanded, leading to more opportunities for misconduct. This framework ensures that corporations are deterred from engaging in illegal conduct by imposing sanctions that could affect their reputation, financial standing, and operational continuity.
Key Aspects of Corporate Criminal Liability
- Vicarious Liability: Vicarious liability is the principle that a corporation can be held responsible for the criminal acts of its employees or agents when those acts are committed within the scope of their employment or authority. For example, if an employee engages in fraud while performing their job duties, the corporation may be held criminally liable for the employeeโs actions, even if the company did not directly authorize the illegal activity.
- Doctrine of โRespondent Superiorโ: This doctrine, often used in the context of corporate criminal liability, holds that an employer (in this case, a corporation) can be liable for the actions of its employees if those actions were taken within the scope of their employment and furthered the employerโs interests. For example, a corporation may be criminally responsible for bribery or environmental violations committed by its employees if those acts were part of the employeeโs job duties.
- Corporate Culture and Knowledge: The actions of higher-ups (executives or directors) may determine corporate criminal liability if they knew about, condoned, or directed criminal behaviour within the organization. However, in some jurisdictions, the criminal liability of a corporation can be established even if lower-level employees committed the offense without the knowledge or approval of top management. Corporate culture plays a significant role in the creation of liability. If a corporate culture encourages or turns a blind eye to illegal actions (e.g., fraud, environmental violations), the corporation may be held criminally accountable.
- Liability for Criminal Acts Committed for Corporate Benefit: A corporation may be held criminally liable if its employees or agents commit a crime for the corporationโs benefit, even if the corporation itself did not explicitly direct the illegal act. For example, a company might be criminally liable if its employees commit tax fraud to reduce the corporationโs tax liability, even if the companyโs senior management did not directly instruct them to do so.
Types of Corporate Crimes
Corporations can be criminally liable for a wide range of offenses, including:
- White-collar crimes: These include fraud, bribery, insider trading, money laundering, and antitrust violations.
- Environmental crimes: Corporations can be held liable for illegal pollution, hazardous waste disposal, or other violations of environmental laws.
- Health and safety violations: Corporations may face criminal penalties for failing to adhere to workplace safety regulations, resulting in accidents or harm to employees or the public.
- Consumer protection violations: This includes crimes like false advertising, misleading labelling, or failing to comply with product safety standards.
Corporations found criminally liable can face a range of penalties, including fines, restitution, compensation, corporate probation, dissolution, disqualifications of officers/directors, civil and criminal actions against individuals.
Corporate Defence to Criminal Liability
Corporations may raise several defences to avoid criminal liability, such as:
- Lack of Knowledge or Authorization: The corporation may claim that it was unaware of the illegal conduct and did not authorize it, especially if the crime was committed by lower-level employees without the knowledge or approval of higher management.
- Compliance Programs: A corporation can argue that it had a strong compliance program in place to prevent criminal conduct. Demonstrating an effective corporate compliance system can help reduce penalties or even avoid liability in some cases.
- Insubordination: A corporation may claim that the employee or agent acted contrary to company policies, and thus, the corporation should not be held liable for the unauthorized actions.
Case Laws:
In Lennardโs Carrying Co. Ltd. v. Asiatic Petroleum Co Ltd., [1915] A.C. 705 case, trying an offence under the Merchant Shipping Act, the House of Lords applied the doctrine of attribution to identify Mr. Lennard, who was the owner of the ship and also responsible for the management of the ship, as the โdirecting mind and willโ of the company.
In H.L Bolton Co. Ltd., v. T.J Graham and Sons, 1 QB 159 (19567) case, the Court of Appeals likened companies to a human body and their brain to the directors of the company, and confirmed the application of the doctrine of attribution to criminal cases.
In the State of Maharashtraย v.ย Syndicate Transport Co. (P) Ltd., AIR 1964 Bom 195 case, the Bombay High Court said: โThe question whether a corporate body should or should not be liable for criminal action resulting from the acts of some individual must depend on the nature of the offence disclosed by the allegations in the complaint or in the charge-sheet, the relative position of the officer or agent vis-a-vis the corporate body and the other relevant facts and circumstances which could show that the corporate body, as such, meant or intended to commit that act.โ
In Asst. Commissionerย v.ย Velliappa Textiles, (2003) 11 SCC 405 case, the Supreme Court held that since company is an artificial person, it cannot be physically punished to a term of imprisonment. But the court also held that where the statute provides for imprisonment or fine, it is not a problem, but where the statute provides for imprisonment and fine, the court is not given the discretion to impose fine in lieu of imprisonment.
In Standard Chartered Bankย v. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2005 SC 2622 case, the Supreme Court without making any reference to doctrine of attribution held that a company can be prosecuted for offences which are punishable with mandatory imprisonment. The Court observed that in cases where imprisonment is mandatory punishment for offence, the mens rea of the persons in shall be treated as the mens rea of the corporation.charge
In Iridium India Telecom Ltd vs Motorola Incorporated & Ors on 20 October, 2010 case, the Apex Court heldย thatย criminal liability of corporations would arise when the offence is committed in relation to the business by a person or body of persons in control of its affairs and when the degree of control is such that a body or body of persons can be said to be its โdirecting mind and willโ. The Court also held that such mens rea would be attributable to the corporation on the principle of โalter egoโ and upheld its earlier decision in the Standard Chartered case. Thereby, the Apex Court has finally resolved the position regarding criminal liability of corporations.
Conclusion
Corporate criminal liability holds corporations accountable for illegal actions committed by their employees, agents, or officers, especially when those actions benefit the corporation. While corporations cannot be imprisoned, they can face significant fines, reputational damage, and other penalties. The legal framework for corporate liability ensures that businesses take responsibility for their role in committing or enabling criminal conduct, and it encourages them to adopt robust compliance programs to avoid illegal activities.
Through these measures, the law aims to deter corporate misconduct, protect public interests, and hold businesses accountable for their impact on society.
For More Articles on the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Click Here