Law and You > Criminal Laws > Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 > Concept Application 1.6 (Situational Problems on Jurisdiction of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita)
In this article, we shall study situational problems on jurisdiction of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b5d7/7b5d7d03d0002d245631ee87b3cc4f4cafdcc9d8" alt="Jurisdiction of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita"
Problem No. 01:
The fishers of village โAโ lawfully fixed fishing stakes in the sea within three miles from the shores. The fishers of village B, annoyed with their act, removed all the fishing stakes. On prosecution accused pleaded that their act could not come within the purview of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Check the validity of the plea of the accused.
Territorial waters of India extends up to a distance of twelve nautical miles from the shores towards the sea. The offence took place within three miles from the shores and was covered within the territory of India. Hence the accused can be tried in Indian Court under Section 1(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
This Situation relates to Kastya Rama v. State, (1871) 8 BHC.
Problem No. 02:
A German national was on his way from Zurich to Manila on a Swiss aircraft that arrived in Bombay while in transit. He remained within the aircraft and did not come out. He did not file a declaration under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, regarding the gold he was carrying. During the checking, the customs found the gold on the aircraft. The accused was booked under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. The cause of action arose in India. The accused pleaded that he was unaware of such Indian Law. Is accused liable under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Yes, He is liable under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. According to Section 1(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โEvery person shall be liable to punishment under this Sanhia and not otherwise for every act or omission contrary to the provisions thereof, of which he shall be guilty within Indiaโ. It is not necessary for Indian law to be published outside India so that foreigners can know about them. Thus Ignorance about the Law or any change in it cannot be pleaded.
This situation relates to Mayer Hans George v. the State of Maharashtra (AIR 1965 SC 722) case.
Problem No. 03:
A foreigner commits an offence in India. He pleaded that he is a stranger to the law and the act in question was not an offence under the law of that personโs home jurisdiction. Can he be punished by the Indian Court?
Yes, under section 1(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. According to Section 1(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โEvery person shall be liable to punishment under this Sanhita and not otherwise for every act or omission contrary to the provisions thereof, of which he shall be guilty within Indiaโ
This Situation relates to R v. Esop, (1836) 173 E.R. 203.
Problem No. 04:
โAโ who is a citizen of India, commits a murder in Uganda. Can he be punished in India?
Yes, โAโ can be punished in India. Section 1(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 gives extra-Territorial Jurisdiction to the Sanhita. According to Section 1(5)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โThe provisions of this Sanhita apply also to any offence committed by any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India and can be tried and convicted of the offence in any place in India at which he may be foundโ.
This situation relates to illustration appended to Section 1(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Problem No. 04:
โAโ a citizen of India, commits a murder in Australia and returned to India and landed at Chennai Airport, where he was detained by Chennai Police. Can he be punished under the the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
Yes, โAโ can be punished under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Section 1(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 gives extra-Territorial Jurisdiction to the Sanhita. According to Section 1(5)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โThe provisions of this Sanhita apply also to any offence committed by any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India and can be tried and convicted of the offence in any place in India at which he may be foundโ. Thus he can be tried under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Chennai.
This situation relates to the illustration appended to Section 1(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
Problem No. 05:
An Indian was murdered by another Indian in a foreign country. The local police did not register it. Can Indian Courts try the case?
Yes, Indian Courts can try this case. Section 1(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 gives extra-Territorial Jurisdiction to the Sanhita. According to Section 1(5)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โThe provisions of this Sanhita apply also to any offence committed by any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India and can be tried and convicted of the offence in any place in India at which he may be foundโ.
This situation relates to Remia v. Sub Inspector of Police, Tanur, 1993 Cri LJ 1098 (Ker) case.
Problem No. 06:
The accused committed an offence in Gulf countries, and came back to India. Can he be punished under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023?
Yes, he can be punished under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Section 1(5) of the Sanhita gives extra-Territorial Jurisdiction to the Sanhia. According to Section 1(5)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โThe provisions of this Sanhita apply also to any offence committed by any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India and can be tried and convicted of the offence in any place in India at which he may be foundโ.
This situation relates to Mohamed Sajeed v. the State of Kerala, (1994) 1 KLT 464 case.
Problem No. 07:
โAโ, a citizen of India, committed murder in India and absconded to Pakistan. Whether โAโ is liable or not under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
โAโ is liable under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. Section 1(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 gives extra-Territorial Jurisdiction to the Sanhita. According to Section 1(5)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โThe provisions of this Sanhita apply also to any offence committed by any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India and can be tried and convicted of the offence in any place in India at which he may be foundโ.
This situation relates to Dawood Ibrahim Kaskarโs case.
Problem No. 08:
โAโ, a rice merchant in Karachi, promised to supply 2000 tons of rice and received the maximum amount from โBโ, a rice merchant in Goa, but โAโ did not supply. โAโ and his partners absconded from Pakistan and settled in London. Can โAโ be tried in India.
โAโ is liable under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. ย According to Section 1(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โEvery person shall be liable to punishment under this Sanhita and not otherwise for every act or omission contrary to the provisions thereof, of which he shall be guilty within Indiaโ. Under S. 1(3) is the locality where the offence is committed and that the corporeal presence of the offender in India is immaterial.
This situation relates to Mobarik Ali v. The State of Bombay, AIR 1957 SC 857 case.
Problem No. 09:
A foreigner, committed and offence in South Africa, and has been staying in India. Can the Indian Courts have jurisdiction to try A.
No, Indian courts have no jurisdiction in this case. If the South African Government requests the Indian Government and there is an extradition treaty between the two countries, then he can be extradited under the Indian Extradition Act, 1962.
This situation relates to Jameson case, 1896 2 QB 425
Problem No. 10:
โAโ, a foreigner, abets a criminal act to be done in India. As the result of the abetment of A, that criminal act is committed in India. Can Indian Courts have jurisdiction to try โAโ?
Yes, A is liable under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. ย According to Section 1(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 โEvery person shall be liable to punishment under this Sanhita and not otherwise for every act or omission contrary to the provisions thereof, of which he shall be guilty within Indiaโ. Under S. 1(3) is the locality where the offence is committed and that the corporeal presence of the offender in India is immaterial.
This situation relates to Chhotalal Baber, (1912) 36 Bom 524
For More Articles on the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Click Here